Tough interrogation of terror suspects is necessary — or is it?

In the latest debate, held on March 11, the formal proposition was “Tough interrogation of terror suspects is necessary.” Minds were changed during the debate. Before the debate, 46 percent of the audience voted in favor of the motion — that tough interrogation of terror suspects is necessary — while 35 percent opposed it (with 19 percent undecided). By the end of the session, 53 percent opposed the motion and only 40 percent favored it, with 7 percent still undecided.

Interesting.

2 Responses to “Tough interrogation of terror suspects is necessary — or is it?”

  1. Article Submission Says:

    Hi, just wanted you to know I have added your site to my bookmarks because of your fantastic blog layout (LOL). With that said, seriously, I think your blog has one of the cleanest design I’ve came across. It honestly helps make reading your blog a lot easier.

  2. Elias Says:

    great article , thanks and we need more wonderful article! Added to digg likewise.|

Leave a Reply