| You are at: [Mediation Services] [adrr.com > Mediation Dialogues and Essays > Case Study] [Mediation Books] |
Running head:
NEGOTIATION IN HEALTH CARE CASE STUDY
Margaret Colleen Davenport
University of Phoenix
Change, Negotiation & Conflict
Resolution
In Health Care
HCS 581.3
Dr. Elizabeth Jane Riegner
June 16, 2001
Workshop
IV
Easton Hospital (EH), a 369-bed hospital, is located in
the Lehigh Valley of Northampton County,
Pennsylvania. It serves 300,000 residents of the county, employs about
1,500, and offers an array of
specialties including renal
dialysis and open heart surgery.
Currently, EH maintains a not-for-profit status.
Eastons financial woes, demonstrated by an expected loss of
$1.5 million for the 2000 fiscal year, prompted a search for a capital
partner. In February 2001, Easton
announced its entry into an exclusive negotiating process with Tenet Healthcare
Corporation. Tenet, the
nations second largest hospital chain, proposed to acquire all Easton
Hospital and property, providing enough capital to retire long-term debt
and create a non-profit community benefit
organization. In the process
of the proposed acquisition, Easton would lose not-for-profit status and
begin paying property tax.
While EH demonstrated hopes for a successful merger, concerns about
Tenet were evident. Studies have shown that for-profit hospitals
reduce care for the indigent. EH
traditionally has provided this service and would hope to
continue. Tenet has had a troubled
history. A spokesman for the California Nurses Association reported
that Tenet prolongs negotiations, provokes nurses into striking, and will
not discuss issues of patient care with nurses. Tenets activity over
the last seven years is to purchase community
hospitals, then to streamline
and cut staff.
Essentially, the proposed negotiation between EH and Tenet consisted
of a 60-day review of the hospital.
Several doctors reported that during this
time Tenet representatives asked
pointed questions about operations and
plans. Tenet admitted examination of EH financial records and
extensive interviews with physicians, nurses and community
leaders. Tenet did not comment
on specifics.
Essentially, Tenet engaged in information gathering, but not in
feedback. After sixty days,
Tenet announced that it would not acquire
EH. Easton hospital officials
said Tenet declared its financial requirement and hospital labor costs as
obstacles to continued
negotiation. A Tenet spokesman
did not agree with this statement, and maintained that Easton did not fit
the criteria for acquisition growth.
Tenet typically chooses top market ranking hospitals to acquire.
The process of Tenets acquisition of Easton Hospital was labeled
as a negotiation period. At
the end of the sixty-day period, when Tenet backed out of the process, it
characterized this time as a diligence
period. At this time, EH physicians
were angry and disappointed that the deal could not be
made. Nurses and support staff
was anxious over prospects of job loss.
Many individuals at EH expressed fear that since Tenet had rejected
them, no one else would be interested.
Edicts of blame were levied at hospital
administration.
When EH and Tenet characterized this time frame as a period of
negotiation, they implied a two-sided process that would end in a mutually
beneficial arrangement. Tenet invested time and money in the acquision process,
and ultimately withdrew because criteria were not
met. EH invested time
and hope into the process. They
continued to lose money in this good faith
period.
EH
currently continues its search for a viable capital
partner. Given the negotiation
style of Tenet, EH may well be better off with a different
partner.
Harper, T. (2001). Has
Easton Hospital found its partner? (2001, February
26). Eastern Pennsylvania
Business Journal, 12, (8) p.1. Retrieved June 13, 2001 from ProQuest 5000 database (Research
Library Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
McDermott, J. (2001). Can
private company heal Easton Hospital?
Tenet Healthcare might take it
over. Meanwhile, doctors are
split on where to place blame.
(2001, April 30).
Morning Call, p. A1.
Retrieved June 16, 2001 from ProQuest 5000 database (Research Library
Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
McDermott, J. (2001). Tenet
calls off talks with Easton Hospital.
Official at financially troubled facility says it will keep searching
for a partner. (2001, May 5).
Morning Call, p. B1. Retrieved June 16, 2001 from ProQuest
5000 database (Research Library Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Prospect of new kind of hospital raises
questions. (2001, February 27).
Morning Call, p. A10.
Retrieved June 13, 2001 from ProQuest 5000 database (Research Library
Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Sharp, K. (2000). Hospital
chain out of recovery But while Tenet Healthcare has grown very profitable,
workers are discontent. (2000,
August 20). Orange County Register, p. K01.
. Retrieved June 13, 2001 from
ProQuest 5000 database (Research Library Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Smithee, A., (2001). Easton
Hospital can be a leader. (2001,
May 13). Morning Call, p. A16. Retrieved June 16, 2001 from ProQuest
5000 database (Research Library Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Wildrick, K.H. (2001).
Easton offers fine patient care. Morning Call, p. A14. Retrieved
June 16, 2001 from ProQuest 5000 database (Research Library Periodicals)
on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Wlazelek, A. (2001). Easton
hospital looks to Tenet for aid.
If negotiations succeed, it would become the regions first
for-profit hospital. (2001,
February 24). Morning Call,
p. A3. Retrieved June 13, 2001 from ProQuest 5000 database (Research Library
Periodicals) on the World Wide Web:
http://www.apollolibrary.com
and
http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
This article Copyright 2001 by Collen Davenport. For her book reviews on Amazon.com, visit:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/cm/member-reviews/-/A3HJFLUFH8135Q/104-8305561-8649557
The copyright to this article remains in the
author.
This Website is by Stephen R.
Marsh
Contact Information at:
http://adrr.com/smarsh/